The problem with definitions.

Here is a typical pseudo-philosophical problem that our society is infused with:
"How can there be an objective truth in a world of subjectivity?" This only seems like a legitimate problem due to ambiguities in the words and misuse of language. This problem doesn't actually exist and i can demonstrate it by defining the words. Objective - the way reality is. Subjective - what we think reality is. Now lets reword the sentence with the new definitions. How can we know the way reality is when we can only think about how reality is? The answer is simple - through methodology such as science + the usage of our senses and its technological extensions such as microscope.